Ultrasound as a therapeutic agent in chronic wound healing has been studied extensively. This systematic review and meta-analysis specifically examines low-frequency (20-30 kHz) ultrasound delivered at either low or high intensity. The objective of this review was to determine whether low-frequency ultrasound used as an adjunctive therapy improves the outcomes of complete healing and reduction of size of chronic lower limb wounds. PubMed, Cochrane/CENTRAL, technical assessment, relevant wound-related journals, and clinical guidelines were searched along with contacting manufacturers and authors of relevant randomized controlled trials were completed. Searches focused on the use of low-frequency ultrasound in randomized controlled trials. Data were collected via a data collection form and was adjudicated independently via coauthors. Meta-analyses and heterogeneity checks were performed using Mantel-Haenszel and inverse variance (fixed and random effects) statistical methods on studies with similar outcomes (complete healing and percent wound area reduction) over similar time periods. Single study results were reported via the statistical methods used in the study. Eight randomized controlled trials were identified. Results demonstrated that early healing (at ≤5 months) in patients with venous stasis and diabetic foot ulcers was favorably influenced by both high- and low-intensity ultrasound delivered at a low frequency-either via contact or noncontact techniques. However, the quality of the data may be suspect, especially for low-frequency low-intensity noncontact ultrasound because of significant biases. In patients presenting with either venous stasis or diabetic foot ulcers (Wagner classification 1-3), early healing appears to be facilitated by either low-frequency low-intensity noncontact ultrasound or low-frequency high-intensity contact ultrasound.
Ennis WJ, Valdes W, Gainer M, Meneses P. Ennis WJ, et al. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2006 Oct;19(8):437-46. doi: 10.1097/00129334-200610000-00011. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2006. PMID: 17008814 Clinical Trial.
Viana L, Pompeo M. Viana L, et al. Wounds. 2017 Aug;29(8):231-239. Wounds. 2017. PMID: 28862977Rastogi A, Bhansali A, Ramachandran S. Rastogi A, et al. Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2019 Mar;18(1):81-88. doi: 10.1177/1534734619832738. Epub 2019 Mar 5. Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2019. PMID: 30836809 Clinical Trial.
Ramundo J, Gray M. Ramundo J, et al. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2008 Nov-Dec;35(6):579-83. doi: 10.1097/01.WON.0000341470.41191.51. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2008. PMID: 19018197 Review.
O'Meara S, Cullum N, Majid M, Sheldon T. O'Meara S, et al. Health Technol Assess. 2000;4(21):1-237. Health Technol Assess. 2000. PMID: 11074391 Review.
Huang J, Sun J, Wang Q, Mo J, Nong Y, Zhai Z, Huang X, Mo J, Lu W. Huang J, et al. Int J Gen Med. 2023 Aug 28;16:3815-3827. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S427401. eCollection 2023. Int J Gen Med. 2023. PMID: 37662508 Free PMC article.
Das R, Le TT, Schiff B, Chorsi MT, Park J, Lam P, Kemerley A, Supran AM, Eshed A, Luu N, Menon NG, Schmidt TA, Wang H, Wu Q, Thirunavukkarasu M, Maulik N, Nguyen TD. Das R, et al. Biomaterials. 2023 Oct;301:122270. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2023.122270. Epub 2023 Aug 8. Biomaterials. 2023. PMID: 37591188
Chen V, Burgess JL, Verpile R, Tomic-Canic M, Pastar I. Chen V, et al. Curr Dermatol Rep. 2022 Jun;11(2):60-72. doi: 10.1007/s13671-022-00354-9. Epub 2022 Mar 25. Curr Dermatol Rep. 2022. PMID: 37007641 Free PMC article.
Nowak M, Mehrholz D, Barańska-Rybak W, Nowicki RJ. Nowak M, et al. Postepy Dermatol Alergol. 2022 Jun;39(3):479-490. doi: 10.5114/ada.2022.117572. Epub 2022 Jul 14. Postepy Dermatol Alergol. 2022. PMID: 35950126 Free PMC article. Review.
Chen H, Yu Z, Liu N, Huang J, Liang X, Liang X, Liang M, Li M, Ni J. Chen H, et al. Int Wound J. 2023 Feb;20(2):448-457. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13893. Epub 2022 Jul 19. Int Wound J. 2023. PMID: 35855676 Free PMC article.